Ole Lynggaard Jø. (@lynggaardj)
Peter Rasmussen (@PeterRa58783464)
Lisa Olsson (@LisaOlsson2)
Bent Preben Nielsen (@bentpn)
Kristian (@KayAgeOfEl)
Please_Stop_The _propaganda (@themuddytrutht)
RT @Anders8455 (Anders Jensen): Hvis man på nuværende tidspunkt ikke kan se, at det israelske styre er et vanvittigt terrorregime, som (sammen med USA) er den virkelige trussel mod fred i Vestasien, så er den fordi, man IKKE VIL se det eller fordi man lever i en alternativ "virkelighed". #dkpol #dkmedier
BasedTeslaFanDanmark (@TeslaFanDanmark)
Jeg har et spørgsmål #dkpol men især til @ClaesTheilgaard og @btdk Hvis en dansk mand flytter til Kina og over tid “bliver kineser,” og han får børn med en kvinde, der også er fra Danmark men er “blevet kineser” ligesom ham, er de så alle sammen nu kinesere? https://t.co/itgpB95z5E
Statsstyret (@Statsstyret)
Jeg har lige blokeret @JoachimBOlsen og jeg vil opfordre alle til at gøre det samme og totalt ignorere ham ved henvendelser. Det skyldes primært tre årsager: A) Han har blokeret mig og ryger ind under princippet, hvis du ikke vil lytte til mig, så vil jeg heller ikke lytte til dig. B) Han er begyndt at blokere andre nationalkonservative, hvilket betyder at han ikke er interesseret i at have nogen former for demokratisk debat. C) Fordi fuck den slimede kusse og alle andre på @btdk. Deres magt består i at vi rent faktisk gider deltage i deres lortespil. Så lad os bare boykotte dem totalt. #dkpol #dkmedier #klovnemedie #ytringsfrihed
ᗰIᑕᕼᗩEᒪ ᗩᑭᑭEᒪ Oᗰ ᒍOᑌᖇᑎᗩᒪIᔕTIK (@OmJournalistik)
Det er vist fair at sige, at DR's politiske analytiker og bestyrelsesmedlem anlægger en mere kritisk og personlig vinkel på Riemer/DBU end #dkpol og offentligheden almindeligvis anlægger på DR. #dkmedier QT @JensRingberg (Jens Ringberg) Det her er en skandale - og den begyndte IKKE i aften! Farvel, Riemer!!
Allan St. Rasmussen (@AllanStRasmuss2)
Any reaction from our 🇩🇰 government @regeringDK and 🇩🇰 politicians #dkpol and 🇩🇰 media #dkmedier? So far … no reaction! Shameful ! QT @EpshtainItay (Itay Epshtain) Like all such agreements, the EU-Israel Agreement contains a human rights clause. In May 2025, in light of mounting evidence of systemic violations of international law in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), a majority of EU Member States requested a review of Israel’s compliance with said human rights clause. By August, in a letter to @eu_eeas chief @kajakallas, the Foreign Ministries of @DutchMFA and @SweMFA recalled that the @EU_Commission found Israel in breach of Article 2, which would justify @EUCouncil suspension of it, and its subsidiary agreements. EU Member States have shown a fragmented approach to their legal obligations. While a few publicly recognised the illegality of Israel’s presence in the oPt, others continue to engage diplomatically without considering concrete measures to address or deter breaches of international law. Israel’s response has been to double down. An unlawful presence, already entrenched across the West Bank and Gaza, is now deepened by acts the law could not be clearer about. Territory cannot be acquired by force. Settlements, expanding at a pace, do not merely consolidate control, they operate as engines of violence, projecting coercion outward onto the Palestinian population. The result is predictable and intended: forced displacement, not incidental but en masse. At the same time, the space for relief and protection is being closed. Impartial humanitarian actors are obstructed, their presence conditioned, their work curtailed. And now, in a move as stark as it is chilling, powers are assumed to summarily execute Palestinians. Law is not absent here. It is being set aside. An adequate response must show a path towards (a) unconditionally and rapidly ending Israel's unlawful presence in Palestine - the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza; and (b) ensuring reparations to Palestine and the Palestinian people for decades of harm.
