De seneste posts fra danske RSS feeds og weblogs på Overskrift.dk om tag'et bush http://www.overskrift.dk Fri, 18 May 2012 11:01:21 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.overskrift.dk/images/overskrift.gif http://www.overskrift.dk Overskrift.dk http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 http://laurajul.dk/2012/05/18/bushy-street-art/ via LauraJul LauraJul Fri, 18 May 2012 02:10:21 +0100 http://www.infowars.dk/content/george-w-bush-requests-more-taxpayer-dollars-any-other-former-president George W. Bush Requests More Taxpayer Dollars Than Any Other Former President Huffington Post admin infowars.dk Thu, 10 May 2012 13:08:43 +0100 http://www.information.dk/300273 Da Charles Taylor, Liberias tidligere præsident, blev kendt skyldig i krigsforbrydelser, hed det sig, at der med dommen var sendt et utvetydigt budskab til siddende statsledere verden over: Tro ikke, at jeres høje embede giver immunitet. Men faktisk var budskabet snarere: Er du leder for en lille svag nation, risikerer du at blive ramt med den internationale rets fulde kraft. Står du derimod i spidsen for en stor og magtfuld nation, har du intet at frygte. George Monbiot Irak-krigen | information.dk Mon, 07 May 2012 19:46:21 +0100 http://www.information.dk/300273 Da Charles Taylor, Liberias tidligere præsident, blev kendt skyldig i krigsforbrydelser, hed det sig, at der med dommen var sendt et utvetydigt budskab til siddende statsledere verden over: Tro ikke, at jeres høje embede giver immunitet. Men faktisk var budskabet snarere: Er du leder for en lille svag nation, risikerer du at blive ramt med den internationale rets fulde kraft. Står du derimod i spidsen for en stor og magtfuld nation, har du intet at frygte. George Monbiot Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Mon, 07 May 2012 19:46:21 +0100 http://www.information.dk/300273 Da Charles Taylor, Liberias tidligere præsident, blev kendt skyldig i krigsforbrydelser, hed det sig, at der med dommen var sendt et utvetydigt budskab til siddende statsledere verden over: Tro ikke, at jeres høje embede giver immunitet. Men faktisk var budskabet snarere: Er du leder for en lille svag nation, risikerer du at blive ramt med den internationale rets fulde kraft. Står du derimod i spidsen for en stor og magtfuld nation, har du intet at frygte. George Monbiot Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Mon, 07 May 2012 19:46:21 +0100 http://www.claushenriksen.com/?p=1635 Print PDF ?Decision Points? er en på alle måder behagelig afsked med George W. Bush som præsident. George W. Bush havde en helt enestående tid som præsident. Han er den præsident, der har haft den højeste approval rating, og han er den, der har haft den laveste. Meningerne om ham som person har været mange og udtalte, men de fleste er blevet farvet af en offensiv meningsmaskine og personlige holdninger. Det med holdningerne kommer vi nok aldrig uden om, når vi taler om en præsident eller en anden person, der påkalder sig megen opmærksomhed. Men aldrig har en præsident været så ramt af omstændighederne omkring sig og så hetzet af en mere og mere synlig opposition, der brugte samtlige våben, de overhovedet havde til deres rådighed. Derfor har jeg glædet mig til at læse bogen, og jeg ser frem til at høre præsidentens egne syn på de mange helt vanvittige beslutninger, han blev kastet ud i. Kort om indhold: ?43?, som præsident George W. Bush også kaldes, havde helt andre planer for sin tid som USA?s leder, end dem han endte med at måtte føre ud i livet. Hans største ønske var at blive kaldt uddannelsernes præsident. Og derfor førte han også valgkamp på uddannelse og de svageste i samfundet samt på at øge hjælpen til verdens svageste nationer ? især i Afrika. Alt det ændrede sig den 11. september, 2001, da en flok al-Qaeda terrorister under ordrer fra Osama Bin Laden angreb USA?s to byer, New York og Washington og dræbte tusindevis af uskyldige mennesker. Fra den dag valgte han at fokusere på et mål og et mål alene: at undgå flere angreb på USA i sin tid som præsident. Det krævede nogle meget store og banebrydende beslutninger, men han lykkedes 100 procent med det. Undervejs var der andre ting, der ikke lykkedes. I sit forsøg på at holde terrorismen ude af USA, fik han med sine cowboy-metoder lige så mange på nakken, som han fik støtter. Og hans reelle diplomatiske sejre blev kastet langt i baggrunden, når han rasede mod ?Ondskabens aksel? og talte om, at ?Hvis du ikke er med os, så er du imod os?. Det var ikke en retorik, verden havde hørt i mange år og da slet ikke under præsident Clinton, der netop havde sat en ære i at holde USA væk fra rollen som verdens politimand. Desværre havde denne politik også åbnet dørene på vid gab for terrorangreb, og derfor var det på ingen som helst måde muligt for George W. Bush at opføre sig på samme måde. Bogen er delt op i kapitler, der cirkulerer omkring nogle af de vigtigste beslutninger, han måtte træffe i sin tid som præsident, heriblandt orkanen Katrina, Irak, Afghanistan, finanskrisen og mange flere. Og hvert kapitel giver både modstanderes og præsidentens egne meninger om emnerne. Min uforbeholdne mening: ?Decision Points? er en fremragende bog, der giver os et rigtig godt blik ind i Det Hvide hus under de otte hektiske år, hvor præsidenten hed George W. Bush. Vi har hørt den ene ?kloge ekspert? efter den anden udtale sig om, hvad, hvorfor og hvordan, og derfor er det en fornøjelse at høre det fra hovedpersonen selv. Det er også en befrielse at høre, hvor han selv mener, han har taget fejl, men også at høre hvor han absolut står fast på, at han har truffet den rette beslutning, selv om en stor del af verdens befolkning måske var af en anden opfattelse ? og hans argumenter for det. George W. Bush er hudløst ærlig om sin egen tid som semi-alkoholiker, og han kan slet ikke skjule sin store kærlighed til selve præsidentembedet. Det er helligt for ham, og det er også derfor, vi på ingen måde har set ham give anden end støtte til sin efterfølger ? modsat en række andre tidligere præsidenter, der stadig i dag stort set blander sig i alt, hvad de kan komme til. Der er ingen tvivl om, at ?43? lavede fejl. Det gør alle præsidenter ? og mennesker, for den sags skyld. Men skal du angribe ham på noget, efter du har læst denne bog, så er det måske hans cowboy-stil. Han synes at have en distance til virkeligheden, der i de fleste tilfælde ikke alene er meget brugbar men sikkert også bydende nødvendig, men som også kan være meget farlig. Jeg tror dog på, at når tiden engang kommer til at se tilbage på de otte år, han var præsident, så vil historien være væsentligt sødere ved ham, end hans modstandere var under hans tid i Det Hvide Hus. Film: ?Decision Points? Release: 2011 Forfatter: George W. Bush che Claushenriksen Mon, 07 May 2012 19:43:33 +0100 http://wirelesshomesecurity-camera.com/what-advice-would-you-give-president-bush-for-the-upcoming-spp-summit-in-quebec.html Wirelesshomesecurity-camera.com – Right here i will give info of home security quebec and you can uncover details and ideas trick about Kidde and other Carbon Monoxide detector, well, today i will give you data of What suggestions would you give President Bush for the upcoming SPP summit in Quebec?. I have some answer for A. [...] Wireless Home Security Camera Wed, 02 May 2012 22:38:23 +0100 http://blog.newyorkjets.dk/2012/05/tilbageblik-pa-jets-2012-draft.html 1. Runde: Quinton Coples, DE, UNCIkke et specielt valg - mange foretrak Melvin Ingram, men egentlig synes jeg ikke kritikken er helt fair. Ja, der er spørgsmålstegn ved Coples motivation, men meget af det kan muligvis bortforklares med en helt umulig situation, med undersøgelser af UNCs collegeprogram og deraf følgende trænerfyringer, der fuldstændig punkterede 2011 sæsonen. Coples har et kæmpe talent og fysikken til at realisere det - dét var et spørgsmålstegn ved Ingram, der oven i købet var lidt en tweener.2. Runde: Stephen Hill, WR, Geirgia TechDet blev til endnu et kæmpe talent, da Jets tradede op efter Stephen Hill. Hill er meget rå, men har ligesom Coples den perfekte fysik og er samtidig hamrende hurtig - læs: et perfekt kompliment til Holmes og Kerley. Greb ikke mange bolde i college, men spillede også i et system hvor man gerne løb bolden 20 gange i træk. Hill var forventet draftet i slutningen af 1. runde, så god værdi i at tage ham i 2.3. Runde: Demario Davis, LB, Arkansas StateDavis er en meget spændende spiller, der giver den fuld skrue hele tiden. Havde han spillet for et større college-program er jeg ikke i tvivl om at han var blevet valgt højere. Mange mener at Jets reach'ede... og det gjorde de måske også lidt, men jeg er ret sikker på at han ville have været væk, når de havde deres næste valg i 6. runde, så hvis de virkelig mener at have fundet guld her, så var det bare om at slå til.6. Runde: Josh Bush, S, Wake ForestJeg var pinedød nødt til at styrke safety-positionen, men valgte altså at vente til 6. runde. Det er helt fint med mig, da det var en tynd årgang og de bedste safetys generelt blev draftet alt for tidligt. Bush er konverteret fra CB og er bedst i coverage... lige hvad Jets har brug for.6. Runde: Terrance Gannaway, RB, BaylorDet blev til en RB med det første kompensationsvalg sent i 6. runde. Gannaway er bedst når han løber op igennem midten. Han vejer mere end den gennemsnitlige RB i årets draft, men har stadig god fart i støvlerne... hvem sagde ground and pound?6. Runde: Robert T. Griffin, OG, BaylorAlle gode gange tre i 6. runde... Offensive liniemænd kan man efter sigende aldrig få for mange af. En stor gut, der formentlig skal skoles til at hjælpe løbeangrebet... igen: hvem sagde ground and pound?7. Runde: Antonio Allen, S, South CarolinaEndnu en safety - denne gang mere en in-the-box type. En god tackler og en produktiv part af et godt South Carolina defence. Mange er overraskede over at Allen faldt så langt, men det kan skyldes at han i college spillede en slags S/LB-hybrid og altså mangler en naturlig position.7. Runde: Jordan White, WR, Western MichiganHvor Hills produktion i college er minimal, så er det modsatte tilfældet med White. Han løber gode ruter, men mangler fart og har døjet med et hav af kritiske skader. noreply@blogger.com (Bundgaard) NewYorkJets.dk - hvor danske jetsfans mødes Wed, 02 May 2012 16:52:00 +0100 http://blog.newyorkjets.dk/2012/05/tilbageblik-pa-jets-2012-draft.html 1. Runde: Quinton Coples, DE, UNCIkke et specielt valg - mange foretrak Melvin Ingram, men egentlig synes jeg ikke kritikken er helt fair. Ja, der er spørgsmålstegn ved Coples motivation, men meget af det kan muligvis bortforklares med en helt umulig situation, med undersøgelser af UNCs collegeprogram og deraf følgende trænerfyringer, der fuldstændig punkterede 2011 sæsonen. Coples har et kæmpe talent og fysikken til at realisere det - dét var et spørgsmålstegn ved Ingram, der oven i købet var lidt en tweener.2. Runde: Stephen Hill, WR, Geirgia TechDet blev til endnu et kæmpe talent, da Jets tradede op efter Stephen Hill. Hill er meget rå, men har ligesom Coples den perfekte fysik og er samtidig hamrende hurtig - læs: et perfekt kompliment til Holmes og Kerley. Greb ikke mange bolde i college, men spillede også i et system hvor man gerne løb bolden 20 gange i træk. Hill var forventet draftet i slutningen af 1. runde, så god værdi i at tage ham i 2.3. Runde: Demario Davis, LB, Arkansas StateDavis er en meget spændende spiller, der giver den fuld skrue hele tiden. Havde han spillet for et større college-program er jeg ikke i tvivl om at han var blevet valgt højere. Mange mener at Jets reach'ede... og det gjorde de måske også lidt, men jeg er ret sikker på at han ville have været væk, når de havde deres næste valg i 6. runde, så hvis de virkelig mener at have fundet guld her, så var det bare om at slå til.6. Runde: Josh Bush, S, Wake ForestJeg var pinedød nødt til at styrke safety-positionen, men valgte altså at vente til 6. runde. Det er helt fint med mig, da det var en tynd årgang og de bedste safetys generelt blev draftet alt for tidligt. Bush er konverteret fra CB og er bedst i coverage... lige hvad Jets har brug for.6. Runde: Terrance Gannaway, RB, BaylorDet blev til en RB med det første kompensationsvalg sent i 6. runde. Gannaway er bedst når han løber op igennem midten. Han vejer mere end den gennemsnitlige RB i årets draft, men har stadig god fart i støvlerne... hvem sagde ground and pound?6. Runde: Robert T. Griffin, OG, BaylorAlle gode gange tre i 6. runde... Offensive liniemænd kan man efter sigende aldrig få for mange af. En stor gut, der formentlig skal skoles til at hjælpe løbeangrebet... igen: hvem sagde ground and pound?7. Runde: Antonio Allen, S, South CarolinaEndnu en safety - denne gang mere en in-the-box type. En god tackler og en produktiv part af et godt South Carolina defence. Mange er overraskede over at Allen faldt så langt, men det kan skyldes at han i college spillede en slags S/LB-hybrid og altså mangler en naturlig position.7. Runde: Jordan White, WR, Western MichiganHvor Hills produktion i college er minimal, så er det modsatte tilfældet med White. Han løber gode ruter, men mangler fart og har døjet med et hav af kritiske skader. noreply@blogger.com (Bundgaard) NewYorkJets.dk - hvor danske jetsfans mødes Wed, 02 May 2012 16:52:00 +0100 http://newmusicunited.com/2012/04/26/lake-tahoe-2012/ Kate Bush released a special limited-edition 2 track 10? vinyl single as part of this year?s Record Store Day on Saturday 21st April. The single couples ?Lake Tahoe? with ?Among Angels?, both tracks taken from Kate?s current album ?50 Words For Snow?. RONNIEROCKET.COM NEWMUSICUNITED.COM Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:26:26 +0100 http://hodja.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/rockstjernen-ted-nugent-efterforskes-af-secret-service-for-kritiske-bemaerkninger-om-hussein-obama/ Hodja Hodjanernes Blog Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:35:58 +0100 http://www.denfri.dk/2012/04/at-hore-graesset-gro/ Backstage in an office at Boulevard Leopold III in Brussels the rehearsals for the forthcoming Iraq Commission are probably in full swing. The man handpicked by the US government in 2009 to head NATO, the man who took Denmark to war for the first time in 150 years, may be called to testify. The three-person committee ? made up of a lawyer and a law professor and chaired by a judge ? has been assigned by the current Danish Social-Democrat-led government to investigate the former VKO (Liberal-Conservative) coalition?s motives for joining the war in 2003 and accusations of torture and mishandling of prisoners held by Danish soldiers in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Predictably VKO are crying foul, insisting this exercise is nothing but politically motivated and an opportunity for ?petty mud throwing?, as Venstre?s Søren Pind has warned. But wasn?t going to war a ?politically-motivated? decision? As for mudslinging, I am not convinced it is worse now than it has ever been. There will always be politicians who would rather play at kindergarten level. In this the scene set in Denmark doesn?t differ from other scenarios in the UK, the Netherlands and other countries that participated in the Iraq war on dubious grounds and are now self-scrutinising. In fact, the similarities are striking and thought-provoking. In Britain, when the so-called Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war was announced in 2009, the then opposition leader David Cameron dismissed it as ?an establishment stitch up?. In Denmark, however, Justice minister Morten Bødskov was quick to conjure up a picture of accountability when he insisted ?the government does not rule out that people will be held accountable?. With an estimated cost of five to 12 million kroner a year, he naturally had to say it. But was he also hinting at the possibility of a political indictment, a resignation or, maybe even a simple (but very expensive) apology? Although seemingly a simple thing to do, real apologies are hard to come by. Politicians are actively discouraged from uttering them. Any red book of how to conduct yourself in public life will tell you that showing remorse is a clear and damaging sign of weakness. And everyone believes it (even if, when it comes to silencing a perceived threat, extorting an apology becomes in turn a favourite pastime). In Britain, watching Tony Blair testify at the Chilcot Inquiry and avoiding any sort of specifics (including distracting everyone by mentioning the possibility of military force to counteract the “looming challenge” posed by Iran) I couldn?t help but think of Pinocchio?s memorable cameo appearance in Shrek III, denying any knowledge of Shrek?s location to his inquisitor, Prince Charming: ?Prince Charming: You! You can’t lie! So tell me puppet… where… is… Shrek? / Pinocchio: Uh. Hmm, well, uh, I don’t know where he’s not. / Prince Charming: You’re telling me you don’t know where Shrek is? / Pinocchio: It wouldn’t be inaccurate to assume that I couldn’t exactly not say that it is or isn’t almost partially incorrect. / Prince Charming: So you do know where he is! / Pinocchio: On the contrary. I’m possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not know where he shouldn’t probably be, if that indeed wasn’t where he isn’t. Even if he wasn’t at where I knew he was? That’d mean I’d really have to know where he wasn’t.? The outcome of the inquiry in Britain is expected this Summer, delayed as it was by the government?s refusal ? ?in the public interest? ? to make “public” details of the conversations and correspondence between Blair and George W. Bush about Iraq. Less ceremoniously, Wikileaks eventually released a secret cable in which the British Ministry of Defence assured US that it had “put measures in place? to protect American interests during the Iraq inquiry. So far we have heard that former Prime Minister Tony Blair was ?reluctant? to discuss Iraq plans with his cabinet for fear of leaks; that troops lacked proper equipment and that post-war planning was poor; and that intelligence in the run-up to the invasion was ?incomplete?. However, most charges remain unanswered. No one remembers exactly why the committee was set up in the first place and the public has dozed off in the process, bored with the protocol and anaesthetised by the media?s feeding frenzy. Will the Danish Iraq committee suffer the same fate? Unlike Britain, where a united parliament voted in favour of the invasion of Iraq, the Danish parties in power today voted against the war. They will have little sympathy towards the politicians who took it upon themselves to take Denmark to war without the full backing of Folketinget. Like Blair in Britain, Anders Fogh Rasmussen will be the star attraction if he testifies. Like Blair, his curriculum vitae and strong connections are both his armour and Achilles heel. If urban myths are to be believed, we are talking of a man whose aversion to germs made him bring his own napkin to State dinners and who at birthday parties would not allow his kids to blow candles unless they were removed from the cake first; yet upon arrival in Washington one day he let go of all phobias, readily embracing a sweat-drenched George W. Bush. Anders Fogh only learns from the best. At a NATO meeting in Tallinn he congratulated Estonia and its Baltic neighbours with, ?punching well above their weight?. The cliché used and abused by Barack Obama at bilateral meetings and hilariously revealed by DR?s programme Detektor. Many here in Denmark believe it was precisely this desire to ?punch above their weight? that may have got their country in a bit of a pickle in Iraq and other places. When and if he testifies it may suit him well to ditch any cavalier attitude and, after the Tallinn episode, he may also want to consider employing a good speechwriter, and if nothing else just play around a bit with Google. Similarly, in a secular, atheist society such as Denmark displays of religious fervour will surely fail to impress. Siding himself with God like Blair did by saying ?God will be my judge?, or admitting voices in your head had told you to fight evil in Iraq and Afghanistan, as in Bush?s case, will certainly give Anders Fogh Rasmussen enough scope to invoke pretty much anything he likes without raising much of an eyebrow. Inquiries such as these must be uncomfortable viewing for the military and those who directly suffered as a result of orders from above, on either side of the conflict. Politicians can get it right or wrong. The troops, however, have no other option but to get it right, and they expect to be able to do it with dignity. So, if there is one good thing to come out of this lengthy, morose and expensive exercise is the sense that politicians should be and still are under some degree of public scrutiny. Usually what starts with a lie ends with a lie. So, no claim, no matter how peremptory, should go unchallenged. The trust Danes have constantly deposited in their political system should also be allowed to continue to thrive. It is only reasonable to hope this inquiry will come up with relevant (certainly exhaustive) recommendations for the future conduct of politics. This, being Denmark, makes it a likely scenario. Whether anyone will care to listen to them is another story. For the time being, get ready to hear the grass grow. If you think it?s worth it. Luis Cardador DENFRI Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:34:00 +0100 http://www.denfri.dk/2012/04/at-hore-graesset-gro/ Backstage in an office at Boulevard Leopold III in Brussels the rehearsals for the forthcoming Iraq Commission are probably in full swing. The man handpicked by the US government in 2009 to head NATO, the man who took Denmark to war for the first time in 150 years, may be called to testify. The three-person committee ? made up of a lawyer and a law professor and chaired by a judge ? has been assigned by the current Danish Social-Democrat-led government to investigate the former VKO (Liberal-Conservative) coalition?s motives for joining the war in 2003 and accusations of torture and mishandling of prisoners held by Danish soldiers in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Predictably VKO are crying foul, insisting this exercise is nothing but politically motivated and an opportunity for ?petty mud throwing?, as Venstre?s Søren Pind has warned. But wasn?t going to war a ?politically-motivated? decision? As for mudslinging, I am not convinced it is worse now than it has ever been. There will always be politicians who would rather play at kindergarten level. In this the scene set in Denmark doesn?t differ from other scenarios in the UK, the Netherlands and other countries that participated in the Iraq war on dubious grounds and are now self-scrutinising. In fact, the similarities are striking and thought-provoking. In Britain, when the so-called Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war was announced in 2009, the then opposition leader David Cameron dismissed it as ?an establishment stitch up?. In Denmark, however, Justice minister Morten Bødskov was quick to conjure up a picture of accountability when he insisted ?the government does not rule out that people will be held accountable?. With an estimated cost of five to 12 million kroner a year, he naturally had to say it. But was he also hinting at the possibility of a political indictment, a resignation or, maybe even a simple (but very expensive) apology? Although seemingly a simple thing to do, real apologies are hard to come by. Politicians are actively discouraged from uttering them. Any red book of how to conduct yourself in public life will tell you that showing remorse is a clear and damaging sign of weakness. And everyone believes it (even if, when it comes to silencing a perceived threat, extorting an apology becomes in turn a favourite pastime). In Britain, watching Tony Blair testify at the Chilcot Inquiry and avoiding any sort of specifics (including distracting everyone by mentioning the possibility of military force to counteract the “looming challenge” posed by Iran) I couldn?t help but think of Pinocchio?s memorable cameo appearance in Shrek III, denying any knowledge of Shrek?s location to his inquisitor, Prince Charming: ?Prince Charming: You! You can’t lie! So tell me puppet… where… is… Shrek? / Pinocchio: Uh. Hmm, well, uh, I don’t know where he’s not. / Prince Charming: You’re telling me you don’t know where Shrek is? / Pinocchio: It wouldn’t be inaccurate to assume that I couldn’t exactly not say that it is or isn’t almost partially incorrect. / Prince Charming: So you do know where he is! / Pinocchio: On the contrary. I’m possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not know where he shouldn’t probably be, if that indeed wasn’t where he isn’t. Even if he wasn’t at where I knew he was? That’d mean I’d really have to know where he wasn’t.? The outcome of the inquiry in Britain is expected this Summer, delayed as it was by the government?s refusal ? ?in the public interest? ? to make “public” details of the conversations and correspondence between Blair and George W. Bush about Iraq. Less ceremoniously, Wikileaks eventually released a secret cable in which the British Ministry of Defence assured US that it had “put measures in place? to protect American interests during the Iraq inquiry. So far we have heard that former Prime Minister Tony Blair was ?reluctant? to discuss Iraq plans with his cabinet for fear of leaks; that troops lacked proper equipment and that post-war planning was poor; and that intelligence in the run-up to the invasion was ?incomplete?. However, most charges remain unanswered. No one remembers exactly why the committee was set up in the first place and the public has dozed off in the process, bored with the protocol and anaesthetised by the media?s feeding frenzy. Will the Danish Iraq committee suffer the same fate? Unlike Britain, where a united parliament voted in favour of the invasion of Iraq, the Danish parties in power today voted against the war. They will have little sympathy towards the politicians who took it upon themselves to take Denmark to war without the full backing of Folketinget. Like Blair in Britain, Anders Fogh Rasmussen will be the star attraction if he testifies. Like Blair, his curriculum vitae and strong connections are both his armour and Achilles heel. If urban myths are to be believed, we are talking of a man whose aversion to germs made him bring his own napkin to State dinners and who at birthday parties would not allow his kids to blow candles unless they were removed from the cake first; yet upon arrival in Washington one day he let go of all phobias, readily embracing a sweat-drenched George W. Bush. Anders Fogh only learns from the best. At a NATO meeting in Tallinn he congratulated Estonia and its Baltic neighbours with, ?punching well above their weight?. The cliché used and abused by Barack Obama at bilateral meetings and hilariously revealed by DR?s programme Detektor. Many here in Denmark believe it was precisely this desire to ?punch above their weight? that may have got their country in a bit of a pickle in Iraq and other places. When and if he testifies it may suit him well to ditch any cavalier attitude and, after the Tallinn episode, he may also want to consider employing a good speechwriter, and if nothing else just play around a bit with Google. Similarly, in a secular, atheist society such as Denmark displays of religious fervour will surely fail to impress. Siding himself with God like Blair did by saying ?God will be my judge?, or admitting voices in your head had told you to fight evil in Iraq and Afghanistan, as in Bush?s case, will certainly give Anders Fogh Rasmussen enough scope to invoke pretty much anything he likes without raising much of an eyebrow. Inquiries such as these must be uncomfortable viewing for the military and those who directly suffered as a result of orders from above, on either side of the conflict. Politicians can get it right or wrong. The troops, however, have no other option but to get it right, and they expect to be able to do it with dignity. So, if there is one good thing to come out of this lengthy, morose and expensive exercise is the sense that politicians should be and still are under some degree of public scrutiny. Usually what starts with a lie ends with a lie. So, no claim, no matter how peremptory, should go unchallenged. The trust Danes have constantly deposited in their political system should also be allowed to continue to thrive. It is only reasonable to hope this inquiry will come up with relevant (certainly exhaustive) recommendations for the future conduct of politics. This, being Denmark, makes it a likely scenario. Whether anyone will care to listen to them is another story. For the time being, get ready to hear the grass grow. If you think it?s worth it. Luis Cardador DENFRI Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:34:00 +0100 http://www.denfri.dk/2012/04/at-hore-graesset-gro/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=at-hore-graesset-gro Backstage in an office at Boulevard Leopold III in Brussels the rehearsals for the forthcoming Iraq Commission are probably in full swing. The man handpicked by the US government in 2009 to head NATO, the man who took Denmark to war for the first time in 150 years, may be called to testify. The three-person committee ? made up of a lawyer and a law professor and chaired by a judge ? has been assigned by the current Danish Social-Democrat-led government to investigate the former VKO (Liberal-Conservative) coalition?s motives for joining the war in 2003 and accusations of torture and mishandling of prisoners held by Danish soldiers in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Predictably VKO are crying foul, insisting this exercise is nothing but politically motivated and an opportunity for ?petty mud throwing?, as Venstre?s Søren Pind has warned. But wasn?t going to war a ?politically-motivated? decision? As for mudslinging, I am not convinced it is worse now than it has ever been. There will always be politicians who would rather play at kindergarten level. In this the scene set in Denmark doesn?t differ from other scenarios in the UK, the Netherlands and other countries that participated in the Iraq war on dubious grounds and are now self-scrutinising. In fact, the similarities are striking and thought-provoking. In Britain, when the so-called Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war was announced in 2009, the then opposition leader David Cameron dismissed it as ?an establishment stitch up?. In Denmark, however, Justice minister Morten Bødskov was quick to conjure up a picture of accountability when he insisted ?the government does not rule out that people will be held accountable?. With an estimated cost of five to 12 million kroner a year, he naturally had to say it. But was he also hinting at the possibility of a political indictment, a resignation or, maybe even a simple (but very expensive) apology? Although seemingly a simple thing to do, real apologies are hard to come by. Politicians are actively discouraged from uttering them. Any red book of how to conduct yourself in public life will tell you that showing remorse is a clear and damaging sign of weakness. And everyone believes it (even if, when it comes to silencing a perceived threat, extorting an apology becomes in turn a favourite pastime). In Britain, watching Tony Blair testify at the Chilcot Inquiry and avoiding any sort of specifics (including distracting everyone by mentioning the possibility of military force to counteract the “looming challenge” posed by Iran) I couldn?t help but think of Pinocchio?s memorable cameo appearance in Shrek III, denying any knowledge of Shrek?s location to his inquisitor, Prince Charming: ?Prince Charming: You! You can’t lie! So tell me puppet… where… is… Shrek? / Pinocchio: Uh. Hmm, well, uh, I don’t know where he’s not. / Prince Charming: You’re telling me you don’t know where Shrek is? / Pinocchio: It wouldn’t be inaccurate to assume that I couldn’t exactly not say that it is or isn’t almost partially incorrect. / Prince Charming: So you do know where he is! / Pinocchio: On the contrary. I’m possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not know where he shouldn’t probably be, if that indeed wasn’t where he isn’t. Even if he wasn’t at where I knew he was? That’d mean I’d really have to know where he wasn’t.? The outcome of the inquiry in Britain is expected this Summer, delayed as it was by the government?s refusal ? ?in the public interest? ? to make “public” details of the conversations and correspondence between Blair and George W. Bush about Iraq. Less ceremoniously, Wikileaks eventually released a secret cable in which the British Ministry of Defence assured US that it had “put measures in place? to protect American interests during the Iraq inquiry. So far we have heard that former Prime Minister Tony Blair was ?reluctant? to discuss Iraq plans with his cabinet for fear of leaks; that troops lacked proper equipment and that post-war planning was poor; and that intelligence in the run-up to the invasion was ?incomplete?. However, most charges remain unanswered. No one remembers exactly why the committee was set up in the first place and the public has dozed off in the process, bored with the protocol and anaesthetised by the media?s feeding frenzy. Will the Danish Iraq committee suffer the same fate? Unlike Britain, where a united parliament voted in favour of the invasion of Iraq, the Danish parties in power today voted against the war. They will have little sympathy towards the politicians who took it upon themselves to take Denmark to war without the full backing of Folketinget. Like Blair in Britain, Anders Fogh Rasmussen will be the star attraction if he testifies. Like Blair, his curriculum vitae and strong connections are both his armour and Achilles heel. If urban myths are to be believed, we are talking of a man whose aversion to germs made him bring his own napkin to State dinners and who at birthday parties would not allow his kids to blow candles unless they were removed from the cake first; yet upon arrival in Washington one day he let go of all phobias, readily embracing a sweat-drenched George W. Bush. Anders Fogh only learns from the best. At a NATO meeting in Tallinn he congratulated Estonia and its Baltic neighbours with, ?punching well above their weight?. The cliché used and abused by Barack Obama at bilateral meetings and hilariously revealed by DR?s programme Detektor. Many here in Denmark believe it was precisely this desire to ?punch above their weight? that may have got their country in a bit of a pickle in Iraq and other places. When and if he testifies it may suit him well to ditch any cavalier attitude and, after the Tallinn episode, he may also want to consider employing a good speechwriter, and if nothing else just play around a bit with Google. Similarly, in a secular, atheist society such as Denmark displays of religious fervour will surely fail to impress. Siding himself with God like Blair did by saying ?God will be my judge?, or admitting voices in your head had told you to fight evil in Iraq and Afghanistan, as in Bush?s case, will certainly give Anders Fogh Rasmussen enough scope to invoke pretty much anything he likes without raising much of an eyebrow. Inquiries such as these must be uncomfortable viewing for the military and those who directly suffered as a result of orders from above, on either side of the conflict. Politicians can get it right or wrong. The troops, however, have no other option but to get it right, and they expect to be able to do it with dignity. So, if there is one good thing to come out of this lengthy, morose and expensive exercise is the sense that politicians should be and still are under some degree of public scrutiny. Usually what starts with a lie ends with a lie. So, no claim, no matter how peremptory, should go unchallenged. The trust Danes have constantly deposited in their political system should also be allowed to continue to thrive. It is only reasonable to hope this inquiry will come up with relevant (certainly exhaustive) recommendations for the future conduct of politics. This, being Denmark, makes it a likely scenario. Whether anyone will care to listen to them is another story. For the time being, get ready to hear the grass grow. If you think it?s worth it. Luis Cardador DENFRI Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:34:00 +0100 http://www.denfri.dk/2012/04/at-hore-graesset-gro/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=at-hore-graesset-gro Backstage in an office at Boulevard Leopold III in Brussels the rehearsals for the forthcoming Iraq Commission are probably in full swing. The man handpicked by the US government in 2009 to head NATO, the man who took Denmark to war for the first time in 150 years, may be called to testify. The three-person committee ? made up of a lawyer and a law professor and chaired by a judge ? has been assigned by the current Danish Social-Democrat-led government to investigate the former VKO (Liberal-Conservative) coalition?s motives for joining the war in 2003 and accusations of torture and mishandling of prisoners held by Danish soldiers in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Predictably VKO are crying foul, insisting this exercise is nothing but politically motivated and an opportunity for ?petty mud throwing?, as Venstre?s Søren Pind has warned. But wasn?t going to war a ?politically-motivated? decision? As for mudslinging, I am not convinced it is worse now than it has ever been. There will always be politicians who would rather play at kindergarten level. In this the scene set in Denmark doesn?t differ from other scenarios in the UK, the Netherlands and other countries that participated in the Iraq war on dubious grounds and are now self-scrutinising. In fact, the similarities are striking and thought-provoking. In Britain, when the so-called Chilcot Inquiry into the Iraq war was announced in 2009, the then opposition leader David Cameron dismissed it as ?an establishment stitch up?. In Denmark, however, Justice minister Morten Bødskov was quick to conjure up a picture of accountability when he insisted ?the government does not rule out that people will be held accountable?. With an estimated cost of five to 12 million kroner a year, he naturally had to say it. But was he also hinting at the possibility of a political indictment, a resignation or, maybe even a simple (but very expensive) apology? Although seemingly a simple thing to do, real apologies are hard to come by. Politicians are actively discouraged from uttering them. Any red book of how to conduct yourself in public life will tell you that showing remorse is a clear and damaging sign of weakness. And everyone believes it (even if, when it comes to silencing a perceived threat, extorting an apology becomes in turn a favourite pastime). In Britain, watching Tony Blair testify at the Chilcot Inquiry and avoiding any sort of specifics (including distracting everyone by mentioning the possibility of military force to counteract the “looming challenge” posed by Iran) I couldn?t help but think of Pinocchio?s memorable cameo appearance in Shrek III, denying any knowledge of Shrek?s location to his inquisitor, Prince Charming: ?Prince Charming: You! You can’t lie! So tell me puppet… where… is… Shrek? / Pinocchio: Uh. Hmm, well, uh, I don’t know where he’s not. / Prince Charming: You’re telling me you don’t know where Shrek is? / Pinocchio: It wouldn’t be inaccurate to assume that I couldn’t exactly not say that it is or isn’t almost partially incorrect. / Prince Charming: So you do know where he is! / Pinocchio: On the contrary. I’m possibly more or less not definitely rejecting the idea that in no way with any amount of uncertainty that I undeniably do or do not know where he shouldn’t probably be, if that indeed wasn’t where he isn’t. Even if he wasn’t at where I knew he was? That’d mean I’d really have to know where he wasn’t.? The outcome of the inquiry in Britain is expected this Summer, delayed as it was by the government?s refusal ? ?in the public interest? ? to make “public” details of the conversations and correspondence between Blair and George W. Bush about Iraq. Less ceremoniously, Wikileaks eventually released a secret cable in which the British Ministry of Defence assured US that it had “put measures in place? to protect American interests during the Iraq inquiry. So far we have heard that former Prime Minister Tony Blair was ?reluctant? to discuss Iraq plans with his cabinet for fear of leaks; that troops lacked proper equipment and that post-war planning was poor; and that intelligence in the run-up to the invasion was ?incomplete?. However, most charges remain unanswered. No one remembers exactly why the committee was set up in the first place and the public has dozed off in the process, bored with the protocol and anaesthetised by the media?s feeding frenzy. Will the Danish Iraq committee suffer the same fate? Unlike Britain, where a united parliament voted in favour of the invasion of Iraq, the Danish parties in power today voted against the war. They will have little sympathy towards the politicians who took it upon themselves to take Denmark to war without the full backing of Folketinget. Like Blair in Britain, Anders Fogh Rasmussen will be the star attraction if he testifies. Like Blair, his curriculum vitae and strong connections are both his armour and Achilles heel. If urban myths are to be believed, we are talking of a man whose aversion to germs made him bring his own napkin to State dinners and who at birthday parties would not allow his kids to blow candles unless they were removed from the cake first; yet upon arrival in Washington one day he let go of all phobias, readily embracing a sweat-drenched George W. Bush. Anders Fogh only learns from the best. At a NATO meeting in Tallinn he congratulated Estonia and its Baltic neighbours with, ?punching well above their weight?. The cliché used and abused by Barack Obama at bilateral meetings and hilariously revealed by DR?s programme Detektor. Many here in Denmark believe it was precisely this desire to ?punch above their weight? that may have got their country in a bit of a pickle in Iraq and other places. When and if he testifies it may suit him well to ditch any cavalier attitude and, after the Tallinn episode, he may also want to consider employing a good speechwriter, and if nothing else just play around a bit with Google. Similarly, in a secular, atheist society such as Denmark displays of religious fervour will surely fail to impress. Siding himself with God like Blair did by saying ?God will be my judge?, or admitting voices in your head had told you to fight evil in Iraq and Afghanistan, as in Bush?s case, will certainly give Anders Fogh Rasmussen enough scope to invoke pretty much anything he likes without raising much of an eyebrow. Inquiries such as these must be uncomfortable viewing for the military and those who directly suffered as a result of orders from above, on either side of the conflict. Politicians can get it right or wrong. The troops, however, have no other option but to get it right, and they expect to be able to do it with dignity. So, if there is one good thing to come out of this lengthy, morose and expensive exercise is the sense that politicians should be and still are under some degree of public scrutiny. Usually what starts with a lie ends with a lie. So, no claim, no matter how peremptory, should go unchallenged. The trust Danes have constantly deposited in their political system should also be allowed to continue to thrive. It is only reasonable to hope this inquiry will come up with relevant (certainly exhaustive) recommendations for the future conduct of politics. This, being Denmark, makes it a likely scenario. Whether anyone will care to listen to them is another story. For the time being, get ready to hear the grass grow. If you think it?s worth it. Luis Cardador DENFRI Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:34:00 +0100 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Newspakistanpk/~3/oYQ9SyGo5Uc/ Lord Nazir Ahmed, the Kashmiri-origin member of British Parliament, disowned the allegations against him, saying he had never announced a bounty on George W Bush and Barrack Obama. The British Labor Party suspended his membership condemning his remarks about world leaders. The party spokesperson, in a statement issued on Sunday, said it utterly condemns these remarks which are totally unacceptable if these comments were accurate. It observed, ?The international community is rightly doing all in its power to seek justice for the victims of the Mumbai bombings and halt terrorism. His membership was suspended due to the statement regarding US Presidents Barrack Obama and George W. Bush?. According to the spokesperson an investigation regarding the remarks would be carried out by the party. Speaking to the media, Lord Nazir rejected the allegations saying he did not announce any bounty on US President instead he made a demand for an action against killers of innocent people in Iran. Replying to a query, he clarified that he did not utter those words what were quoted by theh media. He commented, ?I did not offer a bounty. I said that there have been war crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan and those people who have got strong allegations against them – George W Bush and Tony Blair have been involved in illegal wars and should be brought to justice?. He also said that Labor party officials had not contacted him before announcing the suspension saying, ?They have suspended me? That’s a surprise to me. I did not know. I do not think there’s anything wrong with that?. He clarified that he would deal with the party if it wants to suspend his membership. In his view, the party will have to produce some solid evidence in this regard. In 2009, Lord Ahmed was jailed after he was caught sending and receiving text messages at the wheel, minutes before he was involved in a fatal crash on the M1. He was released after serving 16 days when the Court of Appeal decided his prison sentence should be suspended. Pakistan born Lord Ahmed was made Britain?s first Muslim peer in 1998 and is no stranger to controversy. In 2007 he criticised Tony Blair?s decision to award author Salman Rushdie a Knighthood, saying he had ?blood on his hands?. Faisal Farooq NewsPakistan.pk Mon, 16 Apr 2012 06:31:31 +0100 http://www.ilovemonday.dk/post/20587299762 Daphne Groeneveld by Richard Bush for i-D Spring 2012. Via Fashion Gone Rogue. cecilielundmadsen I love monday Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:03:39 +0100 http://www.infowars.dk/content/cia-committed-%E2%80%98war-crimes%E2%80%99-bush-official-says CIA Committed ?War Crimes,? Bush Official Says Wired admin infowars.dk Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:49:51 +0100 http://ordeneogmig.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/guide-sadan-forforer-du-dit-publikum/   Ligegyldigt om du skal holde en tale til din mormors 80-års fødselsdag, eller om du holder valgtale i din kamp for statsministerposten, er der retoriske tricks, der altid virker. Publikum klapper på bestemte tidspunkter ad bestemte sproglige figurer – … Læs resten → heidisaastamoinen Ordene og mig Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:19:35 +0100 http://www.ilovebeauty.dk/skoenhed/en-ny-generation-af-aktivister/2012/03/ Undskyld min lidt sløve opdatering de sidste par dage, men jeg tillod mig at nyde London, eventen, hotellet og det gode vejr. Men nu er jeg her fluks med nyt. Jeg spenderede nemlig en hel dag i London i selskab med The Body Shop, der i høj grad havde fundet tilbage til sine rødder: aktivisme, dyrevelfærd, community trade, at gøre en forskel med det, man laver. Men hvordan opdaterer man det budskab til anno 2012, hvor det ikke længere handler om at lænke sig til en Greenpeace-båd eller gå på barrikaderne. I stedet handler det om at kigge på sig selv og gøre en forskel lige præcis, dér hvor man er. Det er en helt ny generation af unge modeller blevet kendt for. At engagere sig i miljø og verden omkring dem, at bruge deres stemme og berømmelse til at støtte op omkring positive projekter. De tæller blandt andre Elettra Rosselini (i øvrigt datter af Isabella Rosselini), svenske Angela Lindvall, Lauren Bush (barnebarn af tidligere præsident George Bush) og engelske Lily Cole, som forleden blev afsløret som The Body Shops nye brandambassadør. Hvem hun er, kan du læse næste gang, du klikker ind.  Foto: The Body Shop Charlotte Torpegaard I Love Beauty - Charlotte Torpegaard - Blog Fri, 23 Mar 2012 08:16:42 +0100 http://www.infowars.dk/content/court-appears-be-wary-hearing-free-speech-case Court Appears to Be Wary Hearing Free-Speech Case NY Times admin infowars.dk Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:34:42 +0100 http://twishart.blogspot.com/2012/03/dansk-ude-og-hjemme.html Min tilvaerelse har lige pludselig taget en dansk drejning, som straekker langt ud over noget jeg har vaeret udsat for i over 20 aar; I torsdags fik vi "ferie"barn fra Danmark, som bliver og holder "ferie" i en hel maaned. Jeg tror nok de par gaester vi har haft i huset indtil videre er kureret for at tage her til paa ferie, for de tjener godt nok til foeden mens de er her! Feriebarnet er min Faetter Fiks, som har haenderne skruet rigtigt paa, helt rigtigt til at holde "ferie" hos os, han er nemlig haandvaerker. Der er store fordele ved at have en kaempe familie, som man ogsaa kommer godt ud af det med. :) Til trods for Faetter Fiks har meldt sig frivilligt til at hjaelpe os med at goere huset faerdigt, saa synes jeg ogsaa der skal vaere plads til lidt tant og fjas, saa da jeg saa at Kim Larsen skulle saelge bananer paa Shepherd's Bush Empire i loerdags skyndte jeg mig at bestille billetter til to. Min elskede var helt tilfreds med at han kunne faa lov at slippe denne gang. Han er ellers soed til at tage med, naar fruen vil til koncert. Flaben skuffede ikke! Han har altsaa en helt fantastisk stemme og saa var han venlig nok til at synge adskillige sange fra da mor var knaegt. Den eneste vi ikke fik var "Kvinde min", men vi overlevede ogsaa uden - og kom hjem med stemmen rimeligt intakt. :) Det er tredje gang jeg har set Kim Larsen live - alle tre gange i Shepherd's Bush Empire. Jeg havde aldrig hoert om "Kjukken" indtil de kom til London og det var foerst anden gang jeg hoerte dem at det gik op for mig at de rent faktisk var en gruppe der havde holdt sammen i flere aar. Karsten Skovgaard var den foerste jeg lagde maerke til, da han simpelthen er en helt fantastisk guitarist. At han saa ogsaa kan synge Joanna bliver det jo ikke vaerre af! Jeg har altid vaeret lidt forelsket i en bassist, men til trods for at Vagn Smoerhaar helt klart agerer det kvindelige traekplaster i Kjukken, saa er han altsaa ikke lige min type. En udemaerket bassist er han dog. :) Trommeslageren saa vi ikke meget til fra den vinkel hvor jeg stod, men jeg havde god udsigt til hans stortromme med ordet "MONS" paa forsiden. Vi har altid haft en Mons i familien og jeg elsker bare det navn og sendte en kaerlig tanke til NordSjaelland paa den konto. :) Jeg kan ikke lade vaere med at more mig over at en halvgammel rockmusiker stadig kan tiltraekke saa vidt et publikum og for den sags skyld saa forholdsvis ungt et band. Han kan altsaa lidt mere end bare sit fadervor, den knaegt! noreply@blogger.com (Tina Wishart) Tina - omme i London Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:17:00 +0100 http://twishart.blogspot.com/2012/03/dansk-ude-og-hjemme.html Min tilvaerelse har lige pludselig taget en dansk drejning, som straekker langt ud over noget jeg har vaeret udsat for i over 20 aar; I torsdags fik vi "ferie"barn fra Danmark, som bliver og holder "ferie" i en hel maaned. Jeg tror nok de par gaester vi har haft i huset indtil videre er kureret for at tage her til paa ferie, for de tjener godt nok til foeden mens de er her! Feriebarnet er min Faetter Fiks, som har haenderne skruet rigtigt paa, helt rigtigt til at holde "ferie" hos os, han er nemlig haandvaerker. Der er store fordele ved at have en kaempe familie, som man ogsaa kommer godt ud af det med. :) Til trods for Faetter Fiks har meldt sig frivilligt til at hjaelpe os med at goere huset faerdigt, saa synes jeg ogsaa der skal vaere plads til lidt tant og fjas, saa da jeg saa at Kim Larsen skulle saelge bananer paa Shepherd's Bush Empire i loerdags skyndte jeg mig at bestille billetter til to. Min elskede var helt tilfreds med at han kunne faa lov at slippe denne gang. Han er ellers soed til at tage med, naar fruen vil til koncert. Flaben skuffede ikke! Han har altsaa en helt fantastisk stemme og saa var han venlig nok til at synge adskillige sange fra da mor var knaegt. Den eneste vi ikke fik var "Kvinde min", men vi overlevede ogsaa uden - og kom hjem med stemmen rimeligt intakt. :) Det er tredje gang jeg har set Kim Larsen live - alle tre gange i Shepherd's Bush Empire. Jeg havde aldrig hoert om "Kjukken" indtil de kom til London og det var foerst anden gang jeg hoerte dem at det gik op for mig at de rent faktisk var en gruppe der havde holdt sammen i flere aar. Karsten Skovgaard var den foerste jeg lagde maerke til, da han simpelthen er en helt fantastisk guitarist. At han saa ogsaa kan synge Joanna bliver det jo ikke vaerre af! Jeg har altid vaeret lidt forelsket i en bassist, men til trods for at Vagn Smoerhaar helt klart agerer det kvindelige traekplaster i Kjukken, saa er han altsaa ikke lige min type. En udemaerket bassist er han dog. :) Trommeslageren saa vi ikke meget til fra den vinkel hvor jeg stod, men jeg havde god udsigt til hans stortromme med ordet "MONS" paa forsiden. Vi har altid haft en Mons i familien og jeg elsker bare det navn og sendte en kaerlig tanke til NordSjaelland paa den konto. :) Jeg kan ikke lade vaere med at more mig over at en halvgammel rockmusiker stadig kan tiltraekke saa vidt et publikum og for den sags skyld saa forholdsvis ungt et band. Han kan altsaa lidt mere end bare sit fadervor, den knaegt! noreply@blogger.com (Tina Wishart) Tina - omme i London Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:17:00 +0100 http://www.ilovemonday.dk/post/19644375944 Daphne Groeneveld by Richard Bush for i-D Spring 2012. cecilielundmadsen I love monday Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:00:16 +0100 http://www.infowars.dk/content/war-criminals-bush-and-cheney-can-no-longer-travel-outside-us War Criminals Bush and Cheney Can No Longer Travel Outside the U.S. Activist Post admin infowars.dk Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:35:37 +0100