<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="rss.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Overskrift.dk seneste indlæg for tag: computerworld</title>
        <description>De seneste posts fra danske RSS feeds og weblogs på Overskrift.dk om tag'et computerworld</description>
        <link>http://www.overskrift.dk</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:01:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
            <title>Hvad kan en artikkel i pressen gøre for dig</title>
            <link>http://www.amino.dk:80/blogs/jacob_holm_-_office2godk/archive/2012/01/28/hvad-kan-en-artikkel-i-pressen-g-248-re-for-dig.aspx?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss-feed</link>
            <description>I ugen der lige er gået var jeg omtalt i Computerworld i en historie omkring Nets/PBS langsomme håndtering af min asøgning om et betalingsmodul til min webshop. se - http://www.computerworld.dk/art/208917/historien-om-en-dansk-ivaerksaetters-kamp-mod-nets . I artiklen, der var kritisk overfor Nets, fortalte jeg hvordan der var gået ca 2,5 måned fra jeg ansøgte Nets om et betalingsmodul til at det virkede. Lidt grotesk da min webbutik er meget ordinær og...Læs resten af blogindlægget - Klik her</description>
            <author>Jacob Holm</author>
            <source url="http://www.amino.dk/blogs/jacob_holm_-_office2godk/rss.aspx">Jacob Holm - www.office2go.dk</source>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:56:36 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Enterprise 2.0 maturing with a focus on how we manage, measure, and motivate</title>
            <link>http://blog.podio.com/2011/11/21/enterprise-2-0-maturing-with-a-focus-on-how-we-manage-measure-and-motivate/</link>
            <description>Our next post for Computerworld on ?The Future of Work?
Have you ever been to a technology conference where the technology wasn&amp;#8217;t the most interesting part? That was my experience last week at the Enterprise 2.0 conference, in Santa Clara. Seven years after we first started using the term &amp;#8220;Enterprise 2.0,&amp;#8221; the most interesting content at the conference was about how this type of technology is both enabled by and enabling new ways of managing, measuring, and motivating people.
Of course, there&amp;#8217;s still a lot of technology at the heart of Enterprise 2.0. In fact, the expo floor was (as always) awash in a sea of cloned social feeds and profiles. Social software for business is getting more sophisticated, driven by ongoing innovation in how people communicate and collaborate on tools like Facebook and Twitter. Keynote speaker Tim Young remembers receiving an RFP for social software from a Fortune 100 organization with 450 different feature requirements.
The problem? Our belief that &amp;#8220;if we build it, they will come,&amp;#8221; answers Genentech&amp;#8217;s Principal Systems Architect, Andy Wang, an organization with a great deal of experience using social technology to make their scientists more productive.  Achieving results will require a change in how we manage, measure and motivate.
Read more at the ?Future of Work? on Computerworld?


</description>
            <author>Ryan Nichols</author>
            <source url="http://blog.podio.com/feed/">Podio Blog</source>
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:14:21 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The Small Business Web vs. the Enterprise Suite</title>
            <link>http://blog.podio.com/2011/11/15/the-small-business-web-vs-the-enterprise-suite/</link>
            <description>Our next post for Computerworld on ?The Future of Work? 
I spent the last couple of days at a high energy gathering of the Small Business Web, an organization dedicated to helping small businesses grow through an expanding network of integrated Web applications. The idea is that small pieces of software, loosely joined together, will unleash the same sort of innovation for small businesses that the so called &amp;#8220;Open Web&amp;#8221; has brought to consumers.
Contrast this vision with today&amp;#8217;s reality of providing large enterprises with on-premise software: my years in that industry convinced me that the dominance of these &amp;#8220;Enterprise Suites&amp;#8221; has cost us at least 10 years of innovation in the enterprise software industry. Why? Here are just three key differences between Enterprise Suites and the Small Business Web&amp;#8230;
Read more at the &amp;#8220;Future of Work&amp;#8221; on Computerworld&amp;#8230;

</description>
            <author>Ryan Nichols</author>
            <source url="http://blog.podio.com/feed/">Podio Blog</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:59:26 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What?s most important about work?</title>
            <link>http://blog.podio.com/2011/11/08/whats-most-important-about-work/</link>
            <description>Here&amp;#8217;s our next post for Computerworld on ?The Future of Work,? a weekly series focusing on how the way we get things done is changing, and the role technology plays in supporting this shift. 

What&amp;#8217;s most important about work?  Is it the tasks we&amp;#8217;re trying to get done, the people we&amp;#8217;re trying to get them done with, the documents we use to record our progress, or the data that these documents contain?  Or is there something that brings all these together?  Each implies a very different approach to work, and it&amp;#8217;s worth looking at each in turn.
I was provoked by a fascinating interview last week on TechCrunch with Justin Rosenstein, the former Facebook developer now trying to enter the world of business productivity tools. In that interview, he makes an argument that tasks are the center of work. And indeed, his new system puts tasks and groups of tasks front and center. For example, Justin released a video showing how you can use tasks to manage a recruiting process &amp;#8212; &amp;#8220;just think about every job applicant as a task,&amp;#8221; he instructs.
For most of us, this idea seems a little crazy &amp;#8212; job applicants aren&amp;#8217;t tasks, they&amp;#8217;re people. But this illustrates why tasks aren&amp;#8217;t the most important thing about work &amp;#8212; tasks are just an artifact to make sure we get done what we&amp;#8217;ve decided to get done (e.g., remembering to give that job applicant a call).
But what IS at the center of work? 
Read more at the ?Future of Work? on Computerworld?
</description>
            <author>Ryan Nichols</author>
            <source url="http://blog.podio.com/feed/">Podio Blog</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:59:01 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Lessons on the future of work from the days before email</title>
            <link>http://blog.podio.com/2011/11/02/lessons-on-the-future-of-work-from-the-days-before-email/</link>
            <description>I&amp;#8217;m flattered to have been asked to blog for Computerworld on &amp;#8220;The Future of Work,&amp;#8221; a weekly series focusing on how the way we get things done is changing, and the role technology plays in supporting this shift. We&amp;#8217;ll be posting excerpts here&amp;#8211; please enjoy and let us know what you think!
Like many of you, I just spent the last few hours trying to make some headway on my email inbox, the only 40 year old technology still at the heart of my work day. What better way to relaunch this blog on &amp;#8220;the future of work,&amp;#8221; I thought, than with some reflections on what work was like in the days before email.

These days weren&amp;#8217;t that long ago &amp;#8212; I remember joining the strategy consultancy McKinsey &amp;amp; Company in the mid-90&amp;#8242;s, and spending my entire first day in our New York office getting trained in&amp;#8230; voicemail. Yes, voicemail.
With distributed teams working on-site at hundreds of different clients around the world, voicemail was the tool of choice at McKinsey back then for providing important project updates to the partnership. We were taught how to write an outline of our voicemail&amp;#8217;s three main points ahead of time (there were always three main points), how to record our message clearly, and how to send it to the entire project team at once. Busy partners were trained on how to play back their voicemail at double speed to save time.  Of course, voicemail was a nightmare to work with.
Read more at the &amp;#8220;Future of Work&amp;#8221; on Computerworld&amp;#8230;
</description>
            <author>Ryan Nichols</author>
            <source url="http://blog.podio.com/feed/">Podio Blog</source>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:57:03 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

