De seneste posts fra danske RSS feeds og weblogs på Overskrift.dk om tag'et wikileaks http://www.overskrift.dk Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:02:17 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.2 http://www.overskrift.dk/images/overskrift.gif http://www.overskrift.dk Overskrift.dk http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 http://universalgeni.wordpress.com/2012/04/25/video-julian-assange-interviewer-david-horowitz-hassan-nasrallah/ Universalgeni Veritas Universalis Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:30:44 +0100 http://arbejderen.dk/artikel/2012-04-20/wikileaksadvokat-p-sort-liste -- Ingen beskrivelse -- admin Arbejderen Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:24:12 +0100 http://marketingdebat.dk/julian-assange-gar-i-luften-med-sit-eget-tv-program/ Den kontroversielle Wikileaks-stifter har fået sit debatprogram på russisk tv. View article: Julian Assange går i luften med sit eget tv-program admin Marketingdebat Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:47:00 +0100 http://www.information.dk/298158 Leder»Det er for sent, når først giftgassen er spredt over én af vore store byer.«Statsminister Anders Fogh Rasmussen (V) i Folketinget om Saddam Husseins påståede produktion af masseødelæggelsesvåben 1. oktober 2002»Siden magtoverdragelsen i Irak den 28. juni 2004 har Danmark ikke overdraget personer, som danske styrker har tilbageholdt i Irak, til irakiske myndigheder.«Forsvarsminister Søren Gade (V) i Folketinget i juli og august 2006? De to hovedspørgsmål til Danmarks længe ventede Irak-kommission er tilsyneladende ganske forskellige: 1. Hvad var grundlaget for Danmarks krigsdeltagelse i Irak, og var det kritisabelt? Og 2. Er Danmarks fangepolitik i Irak og Afghanistan kritisabel? Lotte Folke Kaarsholm Irak-krigen | information.dk Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:37:30 +0100 http://www.information.dk/298158 »Det er for sent, når først giftgassen er spredt over én af vore store byer.«Statsminister Anders Fogh Rasmussen (V) i Folketinget om Saddam Husseins påståede produktion af masseødelæggelsesvåben 1. oktober 2002 »Siden magtoverdragelsen i Irak den 28. juni 2004 har Danmark ikke overdraget personer, som danske styrker har tilbageholdt i Irak, til irakiske myndigheder.« Forsvarsminister Søren Gade (V) i Folketinget i juli og august 2006? De to hovedspørgsmål til Danmarks længe ventede Irak-kommission er tilsyneladende ganske forskellige: 1. Hvad var grundlaget for Danmarks krigsdeltagelse i Irak, og var det kritisabelt? Og 2. Er Danmarks fangepolitik i Irak og Afghanistan kritisabel? Lotte Folke Kaarsholm Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:37:30 +0100 http://www.information.dk/298158 »Det er for sent, når først giftgassen er spredt over én af vore store byer.«Statsminister Anders Fogh Rasmussen (V) i Folketinget om Saddam Husseins påståede produktion af masseødelæggelsesvåben 1. oktober 2002 »Siden magtoverdragelsen i Irak den 28. juni 2004 har Danmark ikke overdraget personer, som danske styrker har tilbageholdt i Irak, til irakiske myndigheder.« Forsvarsminister Søren Gade (V) i Folketinget i juli og august 2006? De to hovedspørgsmål til Danmarks længe ventede Irak-kommission er tilsyneladende ganske forskellige: 1. Hvad var grundlaget for Danmarks krigsdeltagelse i Irak, og var det kritisabelt? Og 2. Er Danmarks fangepolitik i Irak og Afghanistan kritisabel? Lotte Folke Kaarsholm Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Wed, 11 Apr 2012 21:37:30 +0100 http://marketingdebat.dk/derfor-brast-drommen-om-cyber-platformen-sealand/ En gammel fæstning i Nordsøen som sikkert dataly for verdens hacker og pirater. Det var drømmen, som aldrig blev til virkelighed. Read more here: Derfor brast drømmen om cyber-platformen Sealand admin Marketingdebat Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:34:00 +0100 http://www.formidlingsnet.dk/handtering-af-information-i-et-digitalt-landskab Charlotte Aagaard, journalist ved Dagbladet Information Oplæg til Medborgerskab, Internationalt formidlingsseminar 2012, 27.3.2012, kl. 10.00 ? 10.45 Charlotte Aagaard var et centralt medlem af den gruppe af journalister, der sidste år minutiøst gik tusinder af Wikileaks-dokumenter om Danmarks Irak-indsats igennem. Med udgangspunkt i de udfordringer og dilemmaer en enorm digital informationsstrøm fører med sig, vil hun diskutere ansvar omkring håndteringen og delingen af information i det digitale landskab. #medborgerskab Rune Clausen Formidlingsnet Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:30:22 +0100 http://arbejderen.dk/artikel/2012-03-22/fn-anklager-usa-brutalitet-mod-manning -- Ingen beskrivelse -- admin Arbejderen Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:36:55 +0100 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/what2012/~3/e_RzYn09a3k/ Mediepersonligheden Julian Assange, som grundlagde hjemmesiden Wikileaks, vil være politiker i Australien.More: WikiLeaks-stifter går ind i politik administrator WHAT!? Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:53:30 +0100 http://www.information.dk/295610 Han var den selvlærte ?elitehacker? bag en række ødelæggende angreb på det amerikanske Senat, på Zimbabwes regering og på flere andre fjender derimellem. Fra sin lejlighed i New York, hvor han boede med sine to børn, førte den 28-årige Hector Xavier Monsegur et dristigt dobbeltliv som internetaktivisten ?Sabu? tilknyttet gruppen LulzSec ? lidt af en berømthed inden for hackernes verden. Tirsdag blev Sabus identitet så afsløret, da det kom frem, at Monsegur havde erkendt sig skyldig i anklager om computerhacking, og at han siden august 2011 havde været informant for FBI, netop som den internationale indsats for at slå ned på hackerkollektivet Anonymous tog fart. Josh Haliday Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:39:53 +0100 http://www.information.dk/295610 Han var den selvlærte ?elitehacker? bag en række ødelæggende angreb på det amerikanske Senat, på Zimbabwes regering og på flere andre fjender derimellem. Fra sin lejlighed i New York, hvor han boede med sine to børn, førte den 28-årige Hector Xavier Monsegur et dristigt dobbeltliv som internetaktivisten ?Sabu? tilknyttet gruppen LulzSec ? lidt af en berømthed inden for hackernes verden. Tirsdag blev Sabus identitet så afsløret, da det kom frem, at Monsegur havde erkendt sig skyldig i anklager om computerhacking, og at han siden august 2011 havde været informant for FBI, netop som den internationale indsats for at slå ned på hackerkollektivet Anonymous tog fart. Josh Haliday Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Thu, 08 Mar 2012 21:39:53 +0100 http://thisisbandit.com/2012/03/stopkony-but-do-it-with-your-eyes-wide-open/ Let me start by telling you a story. Yesterday morning on my way into the office i was checking Twitter as i usually do. I started noticing tweets accompanied by #stopkony and #kony2012. At first it i ignored them but when Questlove from the Roots also tweeted about it, i took notice as i generally respect his opinion on matters. So i clicked the link in his tweet and it lead me to this video. I spent the rest of my commute to work watching this video, and i will happily admit that i was at first hit by the emotions that it is clearly crafted to achieve. But being the cynical asshole that i am i packed those emotions away almost as quickly. I started wondering how such a well produced video had suddenly gotten such a big push on social media, because now i was also starting to see posts on Facebook. (Well crafted btw guys…) Side note…funny how Facebook has become very second mover. But anyway… A quick Google exercise told me a little about the group behind it all, Invisible Children. But not until i found a blog called Visible Children did i get a little more perspective. Now let me just say that i am in no way against righting the many wrongs the former and current wars in Central Africa have created. But i am against blindly retweeting, liking, sharing, posting and backing a movement like this, without knowing a little more about it. So what i learnt from the “other side” about Invisible Children is that apparently : - Only 1/3 of their money they make actually goes to direct services. The rest goes to wages, transportation, film production and so on. Not ideal. - Invisible Children favor direct military intervention, and they fund amongst others, the Ugandan government?s army. So to stop the bad guys, they give money to another kind of just as bad guys. These are just some of the “facts” that i found here. I use the “” merely because in situations like these both sides of the fence tend to overdo it a bit in the facts section. So who should you believe?? Well both and none. Unless you dedicate a significant amount of your time to go on a real fact finding mission, you’re not going to know what the real truth is, and even then you might not find it. All you can do is find peace with your choice. If you decide to back #kony2012 then at least do it knowing as many facts as possible. If you decide not to, the same applies. But i have a question… When did we become such an global online sea of non-critical amplifiers?? My Twitter feed and Facebook timeline has since yesterday morning become swamped with celebs and regular people blindly crying wolf. Now i understand the feeling of wanting to do “something”. But have we really become so fucking lazy that we have forgotten to form our own fucking opinion?? Is this really life?? Have social media, Google, news websites, Wikileaks and 24 hour news channels finally lulled us into a belief that we are being served the truth and nothing but the truth? Has our feeds and timelines become the end all of what we need to know? I will gladly admit to getting most of my news from Twitter, but i follow a lot of different news outlets and individual reporters from many different countries to get a somewhat varied input. But i still look for more on my own. Is it too much to ask the same from the habitual retweeters and co-signers? I hope not. Because if it is, who needs freedom of speech, one convincing voice will be enough. Streetbeat Ps. I still respect Questo, as he is one of the few that actually tweeted the other side as well… Streetbeat BANDIT Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:13:54 +0100 http://thisisbandit.com/2012/03/stopkony-but-do-it-with-your-eyes-wide-open/ Let me start by telling you a story. Yesterday morning on my way into the office i was checking Twitter as i usually do. I started noticing tweets accompanied by #stopkony and #kony2012. At first it i ignored them but when Questlove from the Roots also tweeted about it, i took notice as i generally respect his opinion on matters. So i clicked the link in his tweet and it lead me to this video. I spent the rest of my commute to work watching this video, and i will happily admit that i was at first hit by the emotions that it is clearly crafted to achieve. But being the cynical asshole that i am i packed those emotions away almost as quickly. I started wondering how such a well produced video had suddenly gotten such a big push on social media, because now i was also starting to see posts on Facebook. (Well crafted btw guys…) Side note…funny how Facebook has become very second mover. But anyway… A quick Google exercise told me a little about the group behind it all, Invisible Children. But not until i found a blog called Visible Children did i get a little more perspective. Now let me just say that i am in no way against righting the many wrongs the former and current wars in Central Africa have created. But i am against blindly retweeting, liking, sharing, posting and backing a movement like this, without knowing a little more about it. So what i learnt from the “other side” about Invisible Children is that apparently : - Only 1/3 of their money they make actually goes to direct services. The rest goes to wages, transportation, film production and so on. Not ideal. - Invisible Children favor direct military intervention, and they fund amongst others, the Ugandan government?s army. So to stop the bad guys, they give money to another kind of just as bad guys. These are just some of the “facts” that i found here. I use the “” merely because in situations like these both sides of the fence tend to overdo it a bit in the facts section. So who should you believe?? Well both and none. Unless you dedicate a significant amount of your time to go on a real fact finding mission, you’re not going to know what the real truth is, and even then you might not find it. All you can do is find peace with your choice. If you decide to back #kony2012 then at least do it knowing as many facts as possible. If you decide not to, the same applies. But i have a question… When did we become such an global online sea of non-critical amplifiers?? My Twitter feed and Facebook timeline has since yesterday morning become swamped with celebs and regular people blindly crying wolf. Now i understand the feeling of wanting to do “something”. But have we really become so fucking lazy that we have forgotten to form our own fucking opinion?? Is this really life?? Have social media, Google, news websites, Wikileaks and 24 hour news channels finally lulled us into a belief that we are being served the truth and nothing but the truth? Has our feeds and timelines become the end all of what we need to know? I will gladly admit to getting most of my news from Twitter, but i follow a lot of different news outlets and individual reporters from many different countries to get a somewhat varied input. But i still look for more on my own. Is it too much to ask the same from the habitual retweeters and co-signers? I hope not. Because if it is, who needs freedom of speech, one convincing voice will be enough. Streetbeat Ps. I still respect Questo, as he is one of the few that actually tweeted the other side as well… Streetbeat BANDIT Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:13:54 +0100 http://www.infowars.dk/content/bin-laden-was-not-buried-sea-flown-us-cremation-secret-location-claims-intelligence-boss-lea Bin Laden WAS NOT buried at sea, but flown to the U.S. for cremation at secret location, claims intelligence boss in leaked email Daily Mail admin infowars.dk Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:39:26 +0100 http://www.information.dk/294790 »Jeg tænker på, om der er en fidus i forbindelse med lækkene, vi kan hoppe med på. Der er en oplagt frygtfaktor at sælge det på, hvilket er en positiv ting. Og vi kan tilbyde noget, som it-sikkerhedsfirmaerne ikke kan, nemlig vores fokus på kontraefterretning og overvågning, som Fred og Stick er bedre til end nogen andre på denne jord.« - E-mail, angiveligt sendt af Stratfor-analytikeren Marko Papic, den 8. december 2010 til Stratfor-tænketankens analytikerteam og lækket af Wikileaks mandag Lotte Folke Kaarsholm Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:49:57 +0100 http://www.information.dk/294790 »Jeg tænker på, om der er en fidus i forbindelse med lækkene, vi kan hoppe med på. Der er en oplagt frygtfaktor at sælge det på, hvilket er en positiv ting. Og vi kan tilbyde noget, som it-sikkerhedsfirmaerne ikke kan, nemlig vores fokus på kontraefterretning og overvågning, som Fred og Stick er bedre til end nogen andre på denne jord.« - E-mail, angiveligt sendt af Stratfor-analytikeren Marko Papic, den 8. december 2010 til Stratfor-tænketankens analytikerteam og lækket af Wikileaks mandag Lotte Folke Kaarsholm Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:49:57 +0100 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/what2012/~3/jbSojX0Bg4A/ Manglende lydhørhed over for faglig kritik og manglende indflydelse på strukturændringer har fået en række forskere til at forlade Aarhus Universitet. Universitetet er de seneste uger blevet beskyldt for at fremme en spytslikker- kultur, hvor der ikke er plads til kritik.See more here: Utilfredse forskere flygter fra Aarhus Universitet administrator WHAT!? Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:29:46 +0100 http://www.information.dk/294779 Et privat CIA. Sådan præsenterede kritikere det amerikanske sikkerhedsfirma Stratfor, der i disse dage oplever at få hele firmaets interne korrespondance offentliggjort verden over. Whistleblower-organisationen Wikileaks har i samarbejde med 25 medier verden over foreløbig publiceret hundredvis af mails fra det private firma, der leverer efterretningsbaserede analyser af politiske forhold til mindst 300.000 betalende kunder verden over. Andre to millioner abonnerer på gratis udgivelser fra det amerikanske firma. Stratfor beskyldes af bl.a. Wikileaks-leder Julian Assange for at bruge om ikke ulovlige, så i al fald uetiske metoder for at skaffe oplysninger fra hemmelige agenter over hele verden. Charlotte Aagaard Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:11:18 +0100 http://www.information.dk/294779 Et privat CIA. Sådan præsenterede kritikere det amerikanske sikkerhedsfirma Stratfor, der i disse dage oplever at få hele firmaets interne korrespondance offentliggjort verden over. Whistleblower-organisationen Wikileaks har i samarbejde med 25 medier verden over foreløbig publiceret hundredvis af mails fra det private firma, der leverer efterretningsbaserede analyser af politiske forhold til mindst 300.000 betalende kunder verden over. Andre to millioner abonnerer på gratis udgivelser fra det amerikanske firma. Stratfor beskyldes af bl.a. Wikileaks-leder Julian Assange for at bruge om ikke ulovlige, så i al fald uetiske metoder for at skaffe oplysninger fra hemmelige agenter over hele verden. Charlotte Aagaard Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:11:18 +0100 http://mediawatch.dk/artikel/wikileaks-er-ikke-staerkere-end-sine-oplysninger -- Ingen beskrivelse -- Tine Brødegaard Hansen MediaWatch - mediawatch Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:39 +0100 http://mediawatch.dk/artikel/wikileaks-er-ikke-staerkere-end-sine-oplysninger -- Ingen beskrivelse -- Tine Brødegaard Hansen MediaWatch - mediawatch Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:39 +0100 http://marketingdebat.dk/facebook-skal-gore-flyrejsen-sjovere/ KLM tester en service, hvor du kan vælge din sidemand i flyet baseret på Facebook-profiler. More: Facebook skal gøre flyrejsen sjovere admin Marketingdebat Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:13:00 +0100 http://www.information.dk/294687 Fem millioner interne e-mails fra det amerikanske sikkerhedsfirma Stratfor. Det er den seneste høst af fortrolige dokumenter, som whistleblower-organisationen Wikileaks bringer til offentlighedens kendskab. ?Et privat CIA?, kalder Wikileaks-leder Julian Assange det indflydelsesrige amerikanske firma, der leverer efterretningsanalyser til over 300.000 abonnenter, heriblandt mange regeringsorganisationer, medier og forskningsinstitutioner verden over. I går offentliggjorde wiki-leaks.org de første af de fem millioner interne e-mails, her-iblandt en liste over medie-folk, der angiveligt leverer oplysninger til firmaet. Charlotte Aagaard Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0100 http://www.information.dk/294687 Fem millioner interne e-mails fra det amerikanske sikkerhedsfirma Stratfor. Det er den seneste høst af fortrolige dokumenter, som whistleblower-organisationen Wikileaks bringer til offentlighedens kendskab. ?Et privat CIA?, kalder Wikileaks-leder Julian Assange det indflydelsesrige amerikanske firma, der leverer efterretningsanalyser til over 300.000 abonnenter, heriblandt mange regeringsorganisationer, medier og forskningsinstitutioner verden over. I går offentliggjorde wiki-leaks.org de første af de fem millioner interne e-mails, her-iblandt en liste over medie-folk, der angiveligt leverer oplysninger til firmaet. Charlotte Aagaard Nyheder fra information.dk | information.dk Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0100