Du skal godkende brugen af cookies i kategorien Præferencer, for at kunne logge på Overskrift.
Forlaget Nemesis (@IbenSchartau)
Sven Erik Andersen 🇩🇰🇺🇦🇲🇦 (@SvenErikAnderse)
Henrik Zeberg (@HenrikZeberg)
a.lykke 🇩🇰🇪🇺 (@alr_lykke)
Sven Erik Andersen 🇩🇰🇺🇦🇲🇦 (@SvenErikAnderse)
13:28
RT @Jkylebass (🇺🇸 Kyle Bass 🇹🇼): In the French Alps for school break, I met two Russian families…One, living in Moscow and the other from St. Petersburg. I asked them about the war…they weren’t really concerned as both men were in their 40s and haven’t been affected by the war as of yet. Why does the west allow Russian passport holders travel freely around Europe for vacation? Are we serious about this war or is it just casual? Why not complete travel bans?! #Russia
a.lykke 🇩🇰🇪🇺 (@alr_lykke)
12:05
RT @EU_Made_Simple (EU Made Simple): 🇪🇺 Should Europe Stand With Ukraine? 🇺🇦 On the 4th anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion, the European Parliament adopted a resolution reaffirming support for Ukraine, condemning Russia’s war of aggression, and calling for stronger security guarantees and pressure on Moscow. 📊 By political group: 🔹 Renew Europe, S&D, Greens/EFA, EPP: Strong support, with around 80% of MEPs backing the resolution. 🔹 ECR: Over 60% backing, but with significant abstentions and absentees. 🔹 PfE & The Left: Divisions within, with considerable opposition and abstentions. 🔹 ESN: Strong opposition. 🛡️ The resolution emphasizes that the war is critical to Europe’s security, advocating for a just, lasting peace where Ukraine has a seat at the table. As the war enters its fifth year, Europe is standing firm. But what’s your take? Should Europe continue to stand with Ukraine? 🤔 #EU #Ukraine #SupportUkraine #EuropeanParliament #Russia #Europe
Forlaget Nemesis (@IbenSchartau)
11:36
Standarden i #Danish #Denmark #MetteFrederiksen #BoTengberg #Zelensky @Spolitik @regeringDK #dkpol #dkmedier #war #Krigsretorikeren #KrigKrigKrig #KøbKøbKøb #KillKillKill #Destruction "75 milliarder" #Ukraine #Russia #EU #NATO Hvad er der blevet lovet dig?? ... QT @ ()
Forlaget Nemesis (@IbenSchartau)
08:58
#dkpol #dkmedier #Denmark #MetteFrederiksen @regeringDK @folketinget @Altingetdk @Spolitik #Ukraine #Russia #NATO #EU QT @robinmonotti (Robin Monotti) "NO EXTENSION OF NATO'S JURISDICTION FOR FORCES OF NATO ONE INCH TO THE EAST of a unified Germany" - US Secretary of State Baker to Gorbachev, 1990. Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner "U.S. Secretary of State James Baker’s famous “not one inch eastward” assurance about NATO expansion in his meeting with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev on February 9, 1990, was part of a cascade of assurances about Soviet security given by Western leaders to Gorbachev and other Soviet officials throughout the process of German unification in 1990 and on into 1991, according to declassified U.S., Soviet, German, British and French documents posted today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University The documents show that multiple national leaders were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991, that discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about being misled about NATO expansion were founded in written contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels. The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.” The first concrete assurances by Western leaders on NATO began on January 31, 1990, when West German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher opened the bidding with a major public speech at Tutzing, in Bavaria, on German unification. The U.S. Embassy in Bonn (see Document 1) informed Washington that Genscher made clear “that the changes in Eastern Europe and the German unification process must not lead to an ‘impairment of Soviet security interests.’ Therefore, NATO should rule out an ‘expansion of its territory towards the east, i.e. moving it closer to the Soviet borders.’” The Bonn cable also noted Genscher’s proposal to leave the East German territory out of NATO military structures even in a unified Germany in NATO. This latter idea of special status for the GDR territory was codified in the final German unification treaty signed on September 12, 1990, by the Two-Plus-Four foreign ministers (see Document 25). The former idea about “closer to the Soviet borders” is written down not in treaties but in multiple memoranda of conversation between the Soviets and the highest-level Western interlocutors (Genscher, Kohl, Baker, Gates, Bush, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Major, Woerner, and others) offering assurances throughout 1990 and into 1991 about protecting Soviet security interests and including the USSR in new European security structures. The two issues were related but not the same. Subsequent analysis sometimes conflated the two and argued that the discussion did not involve all of Europe. The documents published below show clearly that it did. The “Tutzing formula” immediately became the center of a flurry of important diplomatic discussions over the next 10 days in 1990, leading to the crucial February 10, 1990, meeting in Moscow between Kohl and Gorbachev when the West German leader achieved Soviet assent in principle to German unification in NATO, as long as NATO did not expand to the east. The Soviets would need much more time to work with their domestic opinion (and financial aid from the West Germans) before formally signing the deal in September 1990. As late as March 1991, according to the diary of the British ambassador to Moscow, British Prime Minister John Major personally assured Gorbachev, “We are not talking about the strengthening of NATO.”
Forlaget Nemesis (@IbenSchartau)
08:53
Media Manipulation in the Ukraine War: Glenn Diesen at the UN Security C... https://t.co/uapIZE7Fr2 via @YouTube #MetteFrederiksen #groupAnimal #dkpol #dkmedier #state #media @folketinget @regeringDK @Spolitik @Altingetdk @politiken @informeren #jubel #idiot @berlingske @weekendavisen @jyllandsposten @kristeligt "Amen" #kirke #dangeorus #propaganda #narrative #false #lying #Ukraine #Russia #NATO #EU #AntiWar #make #Peace