t #russia sidste 24 timer

t #russia seneste måned

t Mest aktive brugere

t Seneste tweets

  • 17:07

    KtMasters (@KTM11123)

    RT @JoinTAB_USA (Take America Back (TAB)): Putin, Trump and Xi may decide Ukraine's fate. Europeans may soon ask Russia to restore order. https://t.co/Fo0zFxd5U0 19 October 2026 #russia #ukraine #tab #leadwhereyoulive https://t.co/yDBvmUtGBr

  • 13:00

    Robin Birkedal 🇩🇰 🇬🇱 🇺🇦 (@RobinBirkedal)

    RT @NOELreports (NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦): Ukraine says its October 11 strike on Yandex data centers near Vladimir hit five of eight buildings, with three likely critically damaged. The Galushkin supercomputer, used to train and support YandexGPT and the Alice voice assistant, was also reportedly hit. #Russia https://t.co/iUmwgB0kDI

  • 09:08

    Carsten Troelsen (@CarstenTroelsen)

    RT @benny0692698414 (benny 🇩🇰 🇫🇴 🇬🇱 🇪🇺 🇺🇦): UKRAINE PAID FOR THE PATRIOT MISSILES. SO WHY ARE DELIVERIES BEING DELAYED? President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has accused the Trump administration of delaying deliveries of Patriot air-defence missiles that Ukraine has already paid for through NATO’s PURL programme. “We paid for the weapons,” Zelenskyy told Bloomberg. According to Zelenskyy, the US is currently delivering around 12 Patriot missiles to Ukraine per month — roughly a quarter of the monthly delivery rate he says Ukraine received under President Joe Biden, when the weapons were supplied without payment. The US has reportedly approved only some of the requested deliveries. Ukraine is paying for weapons it urgently needs to defend its cities, infrastructure and civilians from Russian missile attacks. If these claims are accurate, the delays raise serious questions about Washington’s reliability as an ally and the effectiveness of NATO’s efforts to support Ukraine. Trump says he wants peace. But peace cannot be secured by leaving Ukraine more vulnerable to Russian attacks. When Ukraine has paid for the weapons, it should not have to fight delays as well as Russian missiles. Europe must be prepared to strengthen its own defence capabilities and ensure that Ukraine is not left exposed by uncertainty in Washington. #Ukraine #Trump #Patriot #NATO #Russia #EuropeanSecurity

  • 07:42

    Jorn Wildt (@JornWildt)

    RT @tak_ya_anna (zharynka): 🇺🇦 I wrote about this back on September 6–7. I warned that Putin wasn’t simply looking for another round of peace negotiations over Ukraine. He was pursuing something much bigger: a G3 format in which Russia, the United States, and China would position themselves as the three powers deciding the future of the international order. Now, according to reports attributed to The Wall Street Journal, Putin has proposed a trilateral summit with Trump and Xi Jinping — without Ukraine at the table. The proposal reportedly came during Putin’s October 9 conversation with Trump. No agreement to hold the summit has been announced. This is exactly the scenario I was analyzing in September. Ukraine is not just the subject of these negotiations. Its sovereignty is at stake. And Putin’s apparent ambition goes beyond Ukraine: he wants Russia recognized as one of the powers entitled to decide the fate of other nations. Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine. #Ukraine #Russia #China #USForeignPolicy #G3 #Geopolitics

  • 22:32

    🇩🇰🇺🇦 Viking Fella 🇬🇱🇪🇺 (@VikingNAFOFella)

    RT @markito0171 (C4H10FO2P ☠️): 🇷🇺#Russia St. Petersburg https://t.co/a4mMVlWywR